Difference between revisions of "Messiah Common Jewish Objections"

From AlHaq
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (1 revision imported: from chatGPT)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
{{DISPLAYTITLE:Is Jesus the Jewish Messiah? – Objections (with sources)}}
 
{{MessiahNav|up=Is_Jesus_the_Jewish_Messiah|prev=Messiah_Prophecies_Overview|next=Sin_Is_The_Problem|start=Messiah_Reading_Guide}}
 
{{MessiahNav|up=Is_Jesus_the_Jewish_Messiah|prev=Messiah_Prophecies_Overview|next=Sin_Is_The_Problem|start=Messiah_Reading_Guide}}
  
= Common Jewish Objections (with drill-down pages) =
+
= Common Jewish objections (with sources) =
  
 
{{MessiahSources}}
 
{{MessiahSources}}
  
{{DISPLAYTITLE:Is Jesus the Jewish Messiah? – Objections (with sources)}}
+
This page lists common Jewish objections to Christian claims about Jesus as Messiah, alongside common Christian replies. It documents disagreements and the sources each side appeals to.
__NOTOC__
 
 
 
 
 
This page lists common Jewish objections to Christian claims about Jesus as Messiah, alongside common Christian replies. It is written to document the *disagreements* and the *sources each side appeals to*, not to “settle” them.
 
 
 
== Common Jewish objections and Christian replies ==
 
  
 +
== Objections table ==
 
{| class="wikitable sortable" style="width:100%;"
 
{| class="wikitable sortable" style="width:100%;"
 
! #
 
! #
Line 21: Line 17:
 
| 1
 
| 1
 
| Messiah must accomplish the messianic age (peace, ingathering, Temple, universal knowledge of God)
 
| Messiah must accomplish the messianic age (peace, ingathering, Temple, universal knowledge of God)
| Many Jewish presentations define the Messiah’s role as bringing concrete, public outcomes (e.g., ingathering exiles, rebuilding the Temple, worldwide recognition of God, and peace). On this framing, Jesus did not accomplish these in his lifetime, therefore he is not the Messiah. <ref>{{Cite web |title=Why Jesus Is Not The Jewish Messiah |website=Jews for Judaism (Canada) |url=https://jewsforjudaism.ca/jesus-not-jewish-messiah/}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Melachim uMilchamot – Chapter 11 |website=Chabad.org |url=https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/1188356/jewish/Melachim-uMilchamot-Chapter-11.htm}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Mishneh Torah, Kings and Wars 11:1 |website=Sefaria |url=https://www.sefaria.org/Mishneh_Torah%2C_Kings_and_Wars.11.1?lang=en}}</ref>
+
| Many Jewish presentations define Messiah by public outcomes (Temple rebuilding, ingathering, peace, worldwide knowledge of God). Since this did not occur in Jesus’ lifetime, Jesus is not Messiah on that framing.
| Christianity often answers that Messiah’s work unfolds in stages: the first coming inaugurates redemption; the second consummates it (final judgment, full peace/kingdom). <ref>{{Cite web |title=Acts 1:11 |website=BibleGateway |url=https://www.biblegateway.com/verse/en/Acts%201%3A11}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Catechism of the Catholic Church – Article 7 (“He Will Come Again in Glory”) |website=Vatican.va |url=https://www.vatican.va/content/catechism/en/part_one/section_two/chapter_two/article_7.html}}</ref>
+
<ref>[https://jewsforjudaism.ca/jesus-not-jewish-messiah/ Why Jesus Is Not The Jewish Messiah], ''Jews for Judaism (Canada)'' (accessed 2026-01-18)</ref>
 +
<ref>[https://www.sefaria.org/Mishneh_Torah%2C_Kings_and_Wars.11.1?lang=en Mishneh Torah, Kings and Wars 11:1], ''Sefaria'' (accessed 2026-01-18)</ref>
 +
| Christians often answer with an “already/not-yet” framework: first coming (atonement), second coming (kingdom completion).
 +
<ref>[https://www.biblegateway.com/verse/en/Acts%201%3A11 Acts 1:11], ''BibleGateway'' (accessed 2026-01-18)</ref>
 +
<ref>[https://www.vatican.va/content/catechism/en/part_one/section_two/chapter_two/article_7.html Catechism of the Catholic Church – Article 7], ''Vatican.va'' (accessed 2026-01-18)</ref>
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 2
 
| 2
 
| “Second coming” is not a Jewish concept of Messiah
 
| “Second coming” is not a Jewish concept of Messiah
| Jewish critiques often reject the idea that a failed messianic claimant can “come back later to finish the job,” and note that “Second Coming” language is historically Christian and controversial inside Judaism. <ref>{{Cite web |title=Why Jesus Is Not The Jewish Messiah |website=Jews for Judaism (Canada) |url=https://jewsforjudaism.ca/jesus-not-jewish-messiah/}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=The Splintering of Chabad (letters section) |website=Jewish Action |url=https://jewishaction.com/letters/13648/}}</ref>
+
| Jewish critiques often reject the idea that a messianic claimant can “come back later to finish,” treating it as a Christian innovation.
| Christians treat the return of Christ as central and explicit in the New Testament and in historic creeds and catechesis. <ref>{{Cite web |title=Catechism of the Catholic Church – Article 7 (“He Will Come Again in Glory”) |website=Vatican.va |url=https://www.vatican.va/content/catechism/en/part_one/section_two/chapter_two/article_7.html}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Acts 1:11 |website=BibleGateway |url=https://www.biblegateway.com/verse/en/Acts%201%3A11}}</ref>
+
<ref>[https://jewsforjudaism.org/knowledge/articles/ Jews for Judaism – articles index], ''Jews for Judaism'' (accessed 2026-01-18)</ref>
 +
| Christians treat the return of Christ as central and explicit in New Testament teaching and historic creeds.
 +
<ref>[https://www.biblegateway.com/verse/en/Acts%201%3A11 Acts 1:11], ''BibleGateway'' (accessed 2026-01-18)</ref>
 +
<ref>[https://www.vatican.va/content/catechism/en/part_one/section_two/chapter_two/article_7.html CCC Article 7], ''Vatican.va'' (accessed 2026-01-18)</ref>
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 3
 
| 3
 
| Isaiah 53 “Suffering Servant” is Israel (or another figure), not the Messiah / not Jesus
 
| Isaiah 53 “Suffering Servant” is Israel (or another figure), not the Messiah / not Jesus
| A common rabbinic approach identifies the servant as Israel (often reading “Israel-as-one” in prophetic poetry) and interprets Isaiah 53 accordingly; classic citations include Rashi’s commentary. <ref>{{Cite web |title=Rashi on Isaiah 53:3 |website=Sefaria |url=https://www.sefaria.org/sheets/590811}}</ref>
+
| A common Jewish approach reads the servant corporately (Israel / righteous remnant). Rashi’s Isaiah commentary is frequently cited in modern debate.
| Christians often read Isaiah 53 as messianic and see it echoed in New Testament language about Jesus’ suffering and atonement. <ref>{{Cite web |title=1 Peter 2:24–25 |website=BibleGateway |url=https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1+Peter+2%3A24-25&version=NIV}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Luke 24:26 |website=BibleGateway |url=https://www.biblegateway.com/verse/en/Luke%2024%3A26}}</ref>
+
<ref>[https://www.sefaria.org/Rashi_on_Isaiah.53.3?lang=en Rashi on Isaiah 53:3], ''Sefaria'' (accessed 2026-01-18)</ref>
 +
| Christians often read Isaiah 53 as messianic and see echoes in New Testament descriptions of Jesus’ suffering.
 +
<ref>[https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1+Peter+2%3A24-25&version=NIV 1 Peter 2:24–25], ''BibleGateway'' (accessed 2026-01-18)</ref>
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 4
 
| 4
| Jeremiah 31 “New Covenant” is with Israel/Judah and is Torah-written-on-the-heart — not a “new religion”
+
| Jeremiah 31 “New Covenant” is with Israel/Judah and Torah remains
| Jewish readings stress that Jeremiah explicitly says the covenant is with the House of Israel and the House of Judah, and that the text describes deeper fidelity to Torah rather than its replacement. <ref>{{Cite web |title=Jeremiah 31 and the New Covenant |website=Aish.com |url=https://aish.com/jeremiah-31-and-the-new-covenant/}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Jeremiah's New Covenant – “Is There a Conspiracy…?” |website=Jews for Judaism |url=https://jewsforjudaism.org/knowledge/weekly/jeremiah-s-new-covenant-is-there-a-conspiracy-to-hide-the-truth}}</ref>
+
| Jewish readings emphasize the text explicitly names Israel and Judah and describes Torah written on the heart (internalized fidelity), not replacement.
| Christians commonly cite Hebrews’ use of Jeremiah 31 to argue that Jesus mediates the promised covenant fulfillment. <ref>{{Cite web |title=Hebrews 8 (re: Jeremiah 31) |website=BibleGateway |url=https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Hebrews+8&version=NIV}}</ref>
+
<ref>[https://aish.com/jeremiah-31-and-the-new-covenant/ Jeremiah 31 and the New Covenant], ''Aish'' (accessed 2026-01-18)</ref>
 +
| Christians commonly cite Hebrews’ use of Jeremiah 31 to argue Jesus mediates the covenant’s fulfillment.
 +
<ref>[https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Hebrews+8&version=NIV Hebrews 8], ''BibleGateway'' (accessed 2026-01-18)</ref>
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 5
 
| 5
 
| God’s unity/incorporeality: Messiah is not God; incarnation conflicts with Jewish monotheism
 
| God’s unity/incorporeality: Messiah is not God; incarnation conflicts with Jewish monotheism
| Jewish sources frequently emphasize God’s oneness and incorporeality (e.g., Maimonides’ principles) and reject worship of any human; related texts include “God is not a man…”. <ref>{{Cite web |title=The Thirteen Principles of Faith (Principle 3: God is incorporeal) |website=My Jewish Learning |url=https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/the-thirteen-principles-of-faith/}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Maimonides #3 – God's Incorporeality |website=Aish.com |url=https://aish.com/48924072/}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Numbers 23:19 |website=Sefaria |url=https://www.sefaria.org/Numbers.23.19}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Deuteronomy 6:4 (Shema) |website=Sefaria |url=https://www.sefaria.org/Deuteronomy.6.4}}</ref>
+
| Jewish sources emphasize God’s oneness and incorporeality; worship of a human is rejected.
| Christians argue that the New Testament teaches Jesus’ divinity and incarnation, and that this is compatible with monotheism as understood in Trinitarian theology. <ref>{{Cite web |title=John 1:1 |website=BibleGateway |url=https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=John+1%3A1&version=NIV}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Philippians 2:6–11 |website=BibleGateway |url=https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Philippians+2%3A6-11&version=NIV}}</ref>
+
<ref>[https://www.sefaria.org/Deuteronomy.6.4?lang=en Deuteronomy 6:4], ''Sefaria'' (accessed 2026-01-18)</ref>
 +
<ref>[https://www.sefaria.org/Numbers.23.19?lang=en Numbers 23:19], ''Sefaria'' (accessed 2026-01-18)</ref>
 +
<ref>[https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/the-thirteen-principles-of-faith/ The Thirteen Principles of Faith], ''My Jewish Learning'' (accessed 2026-01-18)</ref>
 +
| Christians argue the New Testament teaches Jesus’ divinity and incarnation as compatible with monotheism (Trinitarian framework).
 +
<ref>[https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=John+1%3A1&version=NIV John 1:1], ''BibleGateway'' (accessed 2026-01-18)</ref>
 +
<ref>[https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Philippians+2%3A6-11&version=NIV Philippians 2:6–11], ''BibleGateway'' (accessed 2026-01-18)</ref>
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 6
 
| 6
| “Proof-texting” and context: Christian readings sometimes detach verses from their plain sense (peshat)
+
| Context and “proof-texting”: Christian readings detach verses from peshat
| Jewish critiques often say New Testament arguments mine passages out of context, and that peshat (linguistic/literary/historical context) should govern meaning. <ref>{{Cite web |title=Christian Proof-Texting |website=Jews for Judaism |url=https://jewsforjudaism.org/knowledge/articles/christian-proof-texting/}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Approaches to Bible Commentary (peshat method) |website=My Jewish Learning |url=https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/jewish-bible-commentary/}}</ref>
+
| Jewish critiques argue New Testament-style fulfillment readings often ignore context and peshat.
| Christians respond that Scripture has multiple “senses” (literal and spiritual) and that typology/fulfillment readings are legitimate within apostolic and church interpretive tradition. <ref>{{Cite web |title=Catechism of the Catholic Church – “The Holy Spirit, Interpreter of Scripture” (CCC 115–119) |website=Vatican.va |url=https://www.vatican.va/content/catechism/en/part_one/section_one/chapter_two/article_3/iii_the_holy_spirit%2C_interpreter_of_scripture.html}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Matthew 2:15 |website=BibleGateway |url=https://www.biblegateway.com/verse/en/Matthew%202%3A15}}</ref>
+
<ref>[https://jewsforjudaism.org/knowledge/articles/christian-proof-texting/ Christian Proof-Texting], ''Jews for Judaism'' (accessed 2026-01-18)</ref>
 +
<ref>[https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/jewish-bible-commentary/ Jewish Bible Commentary (approaches)], ''My Jewish Learning'' (accessed 2026-01-18)</ref>
 +
| Christians reply that Scripture can have more than one “sense,” including typology, and that apostolic interpretation reads earlier texts in light of later revelation.
 +
<ref>[https://www.vatican.va/content/catechism/en/part_one/section_one/chapter_two/article_3/iii_the_holy_spirit%2C_interpreter_of_scripture.html CCC 115–119], ''Vatican.va'' (accessed 2026-01-18)</ref>
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 7
 
| 7
 
| Original sin / inherited guilt is not a Jewish doctrine
 
| Original sin / inherited guilt is not a Jewish doctrine
| Many Jewish explanations reject “original sin” as inherited guilt, emphasizing individual moral responsibility (often appealing to Ezekiel 18 and related texts). <ref>{{Cite web |title=The Jewish View of Sin |website=My Jewish Learning |url=https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/the-jewish-view-of-sin/}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Ezekiel 18:20 |website=Sefaria |url=https://www.sefaria.org/Ezekiel.18.20}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Deuteronomy 24:16 |website=Sefaria |url=https://www.sefaria.org/Deuteronomy.24.16}}</ref>
+
| Many Jewish explanations reject inherited guilt and emphasize individual responsibility.
| Christianity often grounds original sin in Romans 5 and summarizes it in catechetical teaching (while still distinguishing inherited condition from personal culpability). <ref>{{Cite web |title=Romans 5:12–19 |website=BibleGateway |url=https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Romans+5%3A12-19&version=NIV}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Compendium of the Catechism – Q76 “What is original sin?” |website=Vatican.va |url=https://www.vatican.va/archive/compendium_ccc/documents/archive_2005_compendium-ccc_en.html}}</ref>
+
<ref>[https://www.sefaria.org/Ezekiel.18.20?lang=en Ezekiel 18:20], ''Sefaria'' (accessed 2026-01-18)</ref>
 +
<ref>[https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/the-jewish-view-of-sin/ The Jewish View of Sin], ''My Jewish Learning'' (accessed 2026-01-18)</ref>
 +
| Christianity often grounds original sin in Romans 5 and summarizes it in catechesis.
 +
<ref>[https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Romans+5%3A12-19&version=NIV Romans 5:12–19], ''BibleGateway'' (accessed 2026-01-18)</ref>
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 8
 
| 8
| Sacrifices and Temple service: Judaism expects restoration; Christianity says Jesus’ sacrifice is final
+
| Torah tests: Deuteronomy 13 and the danger of a “sign-working” deceiver
| Some Jewish sources (e.g., Rambam) expect a return of full Torah observance including sacrifices in messianic times; there is also intra-Jewish debate (some argue sacrifices may not return). <ref>{{Cite web |title=Melachim uMilchamot – Chapter 11 (re: sacrifices) |website=Chabad.org |url=https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/1188356/jewish/Melachim-uMilchamot-Chapter-11.htm}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Mishneh Torah, Kings and Wars 11:1 |website=Sefaria |url=https://www.sefaria.org/Mishneh_Torah%2C_Kings_and_Wars.11.1?lang=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Animal Sacrifices and the Messianic Period |website=Jewish Virtual Library |url=https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/animal-sacrifices-and-the-messianic-period}}</ref>
+
| Some Jewish objections appeal to Deuteronomy 13: even if signs occur, if someone leads Israel away from Torah/true worship, he is rejected.
| Christians frequently appeal to Hebrews to argue that Jesus’ sacrificial offering is “once for all” and fulfills/ends the sacrificial system as a means of atonement. <ref>{{Cite web |title=Hebrews 10:1–14 |website=BibleGateway |url=https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Hebrews+10%3A1-14&version=NIV}}</ref>
+
<ref>[https://www.sefaria.org/Deuteronomy.13?lang=en Deuteronomy 13], ''Sefaria'' (accessed 2026-01-18)</ref>
 +
| Christians reply by disputing the premise (that Jesus leads away from Torah/God), and by arguing Jesus fulfills Torah rather than annuls it.
 +
<ref>[https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew+5%3A17-20&version=NIV Matthew 5:17–20], ''BibleGateway'' (accessed 2026-01-18)</ref>
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
== Notes ==
 
== Notes ==
 
<references />
 
<references />
 +
 +
{{MessiahNavbox}}
  
 
[[Category:Messiah]]
 
[[Category:Messiah]]
 
[[Category:Jesus]]
 
[[Category:Jesus]]
 
[[Category:Christianity and Judaism]]
 
[[Category:Christianity and Judaism]]
 +

Latest revision as of 02:34, 19 January 2026




Common Jewish objections (with sources)

Sources note: This page aims to represent both Jewish and Christian views fairly. Where a claim describes a Jewish position, it should be supported by Jewish sources (Tanakh, rabbinic texts, or mainstream Jewish explanations). Where a claim describes a Christian position, it should be supported by Christian sources (New Testament, early church, or scholarly references).



This page lists common Jewish objections to Christian claims about Jesus as Messiah, alongside common Christian replies. It documents disagreements and the sources each side appeals to.

Objections table

# Objection (summary) Typical Jewish framing (with sources) Typical Christian reply (with sources)
1 Messiah must accomplish the messianic age (peace, ingathering, Temple, universal knowledge of God) Many Jewish presentations define Messiah by public outcomes (Temple rebuilding, ingathering, peace, worldwide knowledge of God). Since this did not occur in Jesus’ lifetime, Jesus is not Messiah on that framing.

[1] [2]

Christians often answer with an “already/not-yet” framework: first coming (atonement), second coming (kingdom completion).

[3] [4]

2 “Second coming” is not a Jewish concept of Messiah Jewish critiques often reject the idea that a messianic claimant can “come back later to finish,” treating it as a Christian innovation.

[5]

Christians treat the return of Christ as central and explicit in New Testament teaching and historic creeds.

[6] [7]

3 Isaiah 53 “Suffering Servant” is Israel (or another figure), not the Messiah / not Jesus A common Jewish approach reads the servant corporately (Israel / righteous remnant). Rashi’s Isaiah commentary is frequently cited in modern debate.

[8]

Christians often read Isaiah 53 as messianic and see echoes in New Testament descriptions of Jesus’ suffering.

[9]

4 Jeremiah 31 “New Covenant” is with Israel/Judah and Torah remains Jewish readings emphasize the text explicitly names Israel and Judah and describes Torah written on the heart (internalized fidelity), not replacement.

[10]

Christians commonly cite Hebrews’ use of Jeremiah 31 to argue Jesus mediates the covenant’s fulfillment.

[11]

5 God’s unity/incorporeality: Messiah is not God; incarnation conflicts with Jewish monotheism Jewish sources emphasize God’s oneness and incorporeality; worship of a human is rejected.

[12] [13] [14]

Christians argue the New Testament teaches Jesus’ divinity and incarnation as compatible with monotheism (Trinitarian framework).

[15] [16]

6 Context and “proof-texting”: Christian readings detach verses from peshat Jewish critiques argue New Testament-style fulfillment readings often ignore context and peshat.

[17] [18]

Christians reply that Scripture can have more than one “sense,” including typology, and that apostolic interpretation reads earlier texts in light of later revelation.

[19]

7 Original sin / inherited guilt is not a Jewish doctrine Many Jewish explanations reject inherited guilt and emphasize individual responsibility.

[20] [21]

Christianity often grounds original sin in Romans 5 and summarizes it in catechesis.

[22]

8 Torah tests: Deuteronomy 13 and the danger of a “sign-working” deceiver Some Jewish objections appeal to Deuteronomy 13: even if signs occur, if someone leads Israel away from Torah/true worship, he is rejected.

[23]

Christians reply by disputing the premise (that Jesus leads away from Torah/God), and by arguing Jesus fulfills Torah rather than annuls it.

[24]

Notes

  1. Why Jesus Is Not The Jewish Messiah, Jews for Judaism (Canada) (accessed 2026-01-18)
  2. Mishneh Torah, Kings and Wars 11:1, Sefaria (accessed 2026-01-18)
  3. Acts 1:11, BibleGateway (accessed 2026-01-18)
  4. Catechism of the Catholic Church – Article 7, Vatican.va (accessed 2026-01-18)
  5. Jews for Judaism – articles index, Jews for Judaism (accessed 2026-01-18)
  6. Acts 1:11, BibleGateway (accessed 2026-01-18)
  7. CCC Article 7, Vatican.va (accessed 2026-01-18)
  8. Rashi on Isaiah 53:3, Sefaria (accessed 2026-01-18)
  9. 1 Peter 2:24–25, BibleGateway (accessed 2026-01-18)
  10. Jeremiah 31 and the New Covenant, Aish (accessed 2026-01-18)
  11. Hebrews 8, BibleGateway (accessed 2026-01-18)
  12. Deuteronomy 6:4, Sefaria (accessed 2026-01-18)
  13. Numbers 23:19, Sefaria (accessed 2026-01-18)
  14. The Thirteen Principles of Faith, My Jewish Learning (accessed 2026-01-18)
  15. John 1:1, BibleGateway (accessed 2026-01-18)
  16. Philippians 2:6–11, BibleGateway (accessed 2026-01-18)
  17. Christian Proof-Texting, Jews for Judaism (accessed 2026-01-18)
  18. Jewish Bible Commentary (approaches), My Jewish Learning (accessed 2026-01-18)
  19. CCC 115–119, Vatican.va (accessed 2026-01-18)
  20. Ezekiel 18:20, Sefaria (accessed 2026-01-18)
  21. The Jewish View of Sin, My Jewish Learning (accessed 2026-01-18)
  22. Romans 5:12–19, BibleGateway (accessed 2026-01-18)
  23. Deuteronomy 13, Sefaria (accessed 2026-01-18)
  24. Matthew 5:17–20, BibleGateway (accessed 2026-01-18)


Messiah Series Navigation
Start Messiah_Reading_GuideMessiah_Prophecies_OverviewMessiah_Common_Jewish_ObjectionsSin_Is_The_Problem
Key disputed texts Isaiah_53_The_Suffering_ServantDaniel_7_Son_of_Man_and_KingdomNew_Covenant_Jeremiah_31Messiah_Expectations_Peace_Temple_Gathering
Debate add-ons Rambam_Messiah_CriteriaDeuteronomy_13_and_JesusDaniel_9_Seventy_Weeks_OverviewPsalm_110_Priest_King
Sources hub Messiah_Sources (recommended Jewish / Christian / academic references)